September 17, 1862, was the bloodiest single
day in U.S. history. An estimated 6,300 Union and Confederate soldiers died at Antietam, Maryland, in a savage
battle that took place nearly a year and a half into the Civil War. (National Archives) http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/charters_of_freedom_10.html
The American Civil War ended on April 9, 1865.
The war produced about 970,000 casualties (3% of the population), including approximately 620,000 soldier deaths—two-thirds
by disease. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War)
Today, according to estimates, there are over 300,000,000 people
living in America. The 1860 United States Census showed 12,240,000 Americans living in the southern states and
19,203,008 Americans living in the states the census classified as free states. For a total of 31,443,008 Americans
in the 1860 United States Census.
http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/1860a-02.pdf
To show a rough comparison based on population increases
between 1860 (Battle of Antietam 1862) and today, well-over 50,000 Americans would die in battle in a single day,
if the same results happened at Antietam, Maryland on September 17, 1862. The American Civil War produced about
970,000 casualties (3% of the population). Based on today's America, 3% of 300,000,000 would translate
to about 9,000,000 casualties.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2003/iraq/forces/casualties/
What would American politicians do if we lost over
50,000 Americans in a single day's battle?
As of December 20, 2006, according to a CNN count,
2,954 Americans have died in Iraq.
Freedom Is Not Free.
It was not free in 1862 and it is still not free...
....
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/charters_of_freedom_1.html
In 1761, fifteen years before the United States of America burst onto the
world stage with the Declaration of Independence, the American colonists were loyal British subjects who celebrated the coronation
of their new King, George III. The colonies that stretched from present-day Maine to Georgia were distinctly English in character
although they had been settled by Scots, Welsh, Irish, Dutch, Swedes, Finns, Africans, French, Germans, and Swiss, as well
as English.
As English men and women, the American colonists were heirs to the thirteenth-century
English document, the Magna Carta (details below), which established the
principles that no one is above the law (not even the King), and that no one can take away certain rights. So in
1763, when the King began to assert his authority over the colonies to make them share the cost of the Seven Years' War England
had just fought and won, the English colonists protested by invoking their rights as free men and loyal subjects. It was only
after a decade of repeated efforts on the part of the colonists to defend their rights that they resorted to armed conflict
and, eventually, to the unthinkable–separation from the motherland.
Constitution
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution.html
The Federal Convention convened in the State House (Independence Hall) in
Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation. Because the delegations from only two states were at
first present, the members adjourned from day to day until a quorum of seven states was obtained on May 25. Through discussion
and debate it became clear by mid-June that, rather than amend the existing Articles, the Convention would draft an entirely
new frame of government. All through the summer, in closed sessions, the delegates debated, and redrafted the articles of
the new Constitution. Among the chief points at issue were how much power to allow the central government, how many representatives
in Congress to allow each state, and how these representatives should be elected--directly by the people or by the state legislators.
The work of many minds, the Constitution stands as a model of cooperative statesmanship and the art of compromise.
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution.html
....
Bill of Rights
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/bill_of_rights.html
During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, its opponents repeatedly
charged that the Constitution as drafted would open the way to tyranny by the central government. Fresh in their minds was
the memory of the British violation of civil rights before and during the Revolution. They demanded a "bill of rights" that
would spell out the immunities of individual citizens. Several state conventions in their formal ratification of the Constitution
asked for such amendments; others ratified the Constitution with the understanding that the amendments would be offered.
On September 25, 1789, the First Congress of the United States therefore
proposed to the state legislatures 12 amendments to the Constitution that met arguments most frequently advanced against it.
The first two proposed amendments, which concerned the number of constituents for each Representative and the compensation
of Congressmen, were not ratified. Articles 3 to 12, however, ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, constitute
the first 10 amendments of the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights.
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/bill_of_rights.html
....
| The fiery trial
through which we pass, will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation. . . . In giving freedom to the
slave, we assure freedom to the free–honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly save, or
meanly lose, the last best, hope of earth. | President Abraham Lincoln 1862 |
 |
 |
 | |
 |
CHARTERS OF FREEDOM
"A New World Is At Hand."
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/charters_of_freedom_10.html
September 17, 1862, was the bloodiest single day in U.S. history.
An estimated 6,300 Union and Confederate soldiers died at Antietam, Maryland, in a savage battle that took place nearly a
year and a half into the Civil War. It was one day in a war that raged from 1861–65 and cost some 623,000 lives.
In a total national population of twenty-seven million in 1860, that number would be proportionately equivalent to losing
more than five million today. That bloody day marked the seventy-fifth anniversary of the signing of the Constitution.
At stake in the Civil War was the survival of the United States of America
as a single nation. Eleven Southern states, invoking the spirit of 1776, seceded from the Union in 1861 to form a nation they
named the Confederate States of America. The Federal Government refused to allow it. Massive armies representing the Union
and the Confederacy squared off in a conflict that tested the experiment in self-government as never before. At the end of
the Civil War's carnage, the primacy of the Federal Government over the states was indisputably upheld.
Americans had been wrestling with the fundamental question of nationhood
since the earliest days of the Revolution. In 1774, as the British colonists struggled to unite in the cause of American liberty,
Patrick Henry rose to address the Continental Congress in one of its earliest sessions: "The distinctions between Virginians,
Pennsylvanians and New Englanders are no more. I am not a Virginian, but an American." It took the Civil War to make
it so. (See AMENDMENT XIV
that was ratified mostly due to the Civil War below.)
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/charters_of_freedom_10.html
....
The
more men you make free, the more freedom is strengthened, and the . . . greater is the security of the State.
| Frederick Douglas
1864 |
 |
 |
 | |
 |
The four years of Civil War that ripped apart the nation from
1861–65 achieved what seventy-five years of compromise could not: it resolved once and for all the question of slavery
in the United States. By 1860, there were 4.5 million slaves in the United States. Military necessity and the force of human
passion for liberty pushed emancipation to the top of the nation's agenda. Two major milestones marked slavery's final destruction
during the war years: the Emancipation Proclamation and the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation
on January 1, 1863, declaring that "all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious areas "are and henceforward shall be
free." It also announced the acceptance of former slaves into the Union's armed forces. The Constitution grants extended powers
to the President during times of war, and although it would not permit the President to interfere with slavery in the states
under normal circumstances, it would do so during wartime.
President Lincoln feared that the Emancipation Proclamation would
be overturned once the war ended. A constitutional amendment would ensure that slavery could never again resurface. Congress
formally proposed the Thirteenth Amendment outlawing slavery on January 31, 1865; it was ratified on December 6, 1865.
....
PTSD Veteran Support· Email Group
Founded:
Apr 21, 2006
There are already 7,199 Members
And Growing Everyday...
"YOU ARE NOT ALONE."
War_Zone_Related_Stress_Reactions
In 1215, the Magna Carta
established the principles that no one is above the law (not even the King),
and that no one can
take away certain rights.
Someday, even New Jersey
will recognize these same rights of PTSD veterans.
--------------------
Magna Carta
Magna Carta (Latin for "Great Charter", literally "Great Paper"), also called Magna
Carta Libertatum ("Great Charter of Freedoms"), is an English charter originally issued in 1215. Magna Carta was the most significant early influence on the long
historical process that led to the rule of constitutional law today. Magna Carta influenced many common law documents, such as the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, and is considered one of the most important legal documents in
the history of democracy.
Magna Carta was originally created because of disagreements between
Pope Innocent III, King John and his English barons about the rights of the King. Magna Carta required the king to renounce certain rights, respect
certain legal procedures and accept that the will of the king could be bound by law. Many clauses were renewed throughout the Middle Ages, and further during the Tudor and Stuart periods, and the 17th and 18th centuries. By the early 19th century
most clauses had been repealed from English law.
There are a number of popular misconceptions about Magna Carta,
such as that it was the first document to limit the power of an English king by law (it was not the first, and was partly
based on the Charter of Liberties); that it in practice limited the power of the king (it mostly
did not in the Middle Ages); and that it is a single static document (it is a variety of documents
referred to under a common name).
....
AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified
July 9, 1868.
Note: Article I, section 2, of
the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized
in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein
they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United
States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (What
is DUE PROCESS below.)
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned
among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding
Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President
of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature
thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age,* and citizens of the United
States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein
shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens
twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or
Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United
States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United
States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution
of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies
thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt
of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing
insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt
or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation
of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have the power
to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
*Changed by section 1 of the 26th amendment.
---------------------
Ratified July 9, 1868, the XIVth AMENDMENT of the United States gave all Americans the Right
to Due Process.
In 1215, the Magna Carta
established the principles that no one is above the law (not even the King),
and that no one can
take away certain rights.
(National Archives)
Someday, even New Jersey
will recognize these same rights. In New Jersey, the influential are above the law.
-------------------
DUE PROCESS
In United States law, adopted from English law, due process (more fully due
process of law) is the principle that the government must normally respect all of a person's legal rights instead of just
some or most of those legal rights when the government deprives a person of life, liberty, or property. Due process has also
been frequently interpreted as placing limitations on laws and legal proceedings, in order for judges instead of legislators
to guarantee fundamental fairness, justice, and liberty. The latter interpretation is analogous to the concepts of natural justice and procedural justice used in various other jurisdictions.