|
|
 |
|
Please turn on your computer's speakers and press your "Refresh"
key to hear John Kerry admit to war crimes. If you would like to hear it again, please press your "Refresh" key.
|
.
.
On June 6, 1971, John Kerry described the work of the
Swift boats to the Washington Star as follows:
"We established an American presence in most cases by showing the flag and
firing at sampans and villages along the banks. Those were our instructions, but they seemed so out of line that we finally
began to go ashore, against our orders, and investigate the villages that were supposed to be our targets. We discovered we
were butchering a lot of innocent people, and morale became so low among the officers on those 'swift boats' that we were
called back to Saigon for special instructions from Gen. Abrams. He told us we were doing the right thing. He said our efforts
would help win the war in the long run. That's when I realized I could never remain silent about the realities of the war
in Vietnam."
What John Kerry told the Washington Star was a lie.
Contrary to Kerry's claim, our consistent policy was to take every precaution
to avoid harming civilians. On many occasions we did this at the cost of suffering additional casualties ourselves. We have
interviewed hundreds of veterans who served on the Swift Boats or supported them, and there is simply no justification for
Kerry's statement. Several members of our organization addressed the issue of atrocities during our May 4 press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.
John Kerry also completely misrepresented our meeting with General Abrams
and Admiral Zumwalt. Far from being a pep talk for officers distressed by their butchery of civilians,
the purpose of this conference with the two highest-ranking American officers in Vietnam was to announce a new Swift boat
mission: to drive the Vietcong out of the Ca Mau Peninsula. The goal of Operation SeaLords was to dominate the rivers in this
area, and to eventually establish a permanent presence in the Cua Lon River, an effort later named Operation SeaFloat. This
was to be done publicly, with the full participation of the media, to negate the claim of North Vietnamese negotiator Lee
Duc Tho that Henry Kissinger could not legitimately represent South Vietnam because the U.S. did not control these areas.
We succeeded in that mission. We returned to Anthoi and drove the Vietcong
out of the region, and soon the North Vietnamese and Vietcong representatives in Paris returned to the negotiating tables.
----------
As its dominant tactic in their battle against the war,
the antiwar movement successfully demonized Vietnam veterans by calling a series of "tribunals" or hearings into war crimes.
But... they were packed with pretenders and liars -- historian Guenter Lewy, writing in "America in Vietnam"
John Kerry's lies about the activities of the Swift boats were part of a larger
pattern of deception. As a leader of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW), Kerry testified before the Senate Committee
on Foreign Relations on April 22, 1971, telling the Senators and a national audience that American troops "...had personally
raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off
limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in fashion reminiscent of Ghengis Khan, shot cattle and
dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam..." and accused the U.S. military
of committing war crimes "on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command."
Kerry's charges were based on a VVAW conference called the "Winter Soldier
Investigation" -- a leftist propaganda event funded primarily by Jane Fonda. None of the Winter Soldier "witnesses" Kerry
cited were willing to sign affadavits, and their gruesome stories lacked the names, dates and places that would allow their
claims to be tested. Few were willing to cooperate with military investigators. The Naval Investigative Service found that
several of the veterans said to have given statements at Winter Soldier were in fact imposters using the name of real veterans.
False testimony and exaggerations were primary characteristics of the war crimes disinformation campaign, and also of the VVAW itself. Executive Secretary Al Hubbard, for example, claimed
to have been an Air Force Captain wounded in Vietnam piloting a transport plane. In fact, Hubbard had been a staff sergeant
who was not a pilot and who was never assigned to Vietnam.
John Kerry and the VVAW worked closely with America's wartime enemies, arranged
multiple meetings with the North Vietnamese and Vietcong leadership, and consistently supported their positions. Kerry and
his radical comrades also played a key role in defining the false, damaging image of Vietnam veterans as psychologically disabled
alcoholics and addicts, haunted by the crimes they had been forced to commit in a "racist" war.
Detailed information about the anti-war activities of John Kerry and the VVAW
can be found at WinterSoldier.com.
---------- |
http://horse.he.net/~swiftpow/index.php?topic=WarCrimes
|
 |
The Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation can be contacted by
emailing vets@vvlf.org or by mail at:
Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation
Philadelphia, PA 19195-1655
 |
|
 | 
 |
 |
|
POWs LAWSUIT COULD FORCE KERRY TO COME CLEAN ON VIETNAM ‘WAR CRIMES’ CHARGES
When John Kerry slandered an entire generation of men who fought in Vietnam he branded them as "war criminals."
Today, much of the same thing is being said about our young men and women in Iraq.
Now, a lawsuit filed in Philadelphia’s Court of Common Pleas will test the very foundation of Kerry’s
anti-war persona for the first time. It isn’t dubious medals or Kerry’s disputed service record in Vietnam
that is being called into question. This time Kerry may finally be forced to answer for the events that launched his public
career, one that made him an anti-war hero for many American liberals and a turncoat for millions of Vietnam veterans.
The lawsuit (Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation, et al. v. Kenneth Campbell, et al.) challenges the basis,
the factual accuracy of then Lt. (j.g.) Kerry’s acrimonious testimony before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee
in 1971. It was there Kerry’s public career was catapulted with his now ubiquitous portrayal of American soldiers
as murderers, rapists and torturers "who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam . . . [and] razed villages in a fashion
reminiscent of Genghis Khan."
For the anti-war, anti-American protesters, the American soldiers are the "terrorists," and the enemies are
the victims of a barbaric U.S. military which tortures and murders defenseless civilians.
That false premise, one of the most vicious and enduring smears spawned by Kerry 35 years ago, will also be
put to the test once Kerry’s true "Band of Brothers" are put under oath in a Philadelphia courtroom.
The background to this lawsuit is long and complex, but even a condensed version is rich in irony and poetic
justice.
It had it roots in 2004 with the documentary Stolen Honor: Wounds that Never Heal. Many may recall
the film, although it is probably best known for not being seen, suppressed after Sinclair Broadcasting Company courageously
announced it was going to air the documentary in its entirety. Thanks to Kerry and his liberal colleagues in the Senate
and their enablers in the mainstream media, Sinclair was browbeaten into withdrawing the film, its broadcast license threatened
by a Kerry campaign manager in 2004. The film’s producer, Carlton Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize and Peabody Award-winning
investigative reporter, interviewed former POWs for the documentary.
I was among those whom Sherwood, a decorated Marine combat veteran himself, asked to participate in Stolen
Honor. I was a POW for nearly six years, held in North Vietnam prison camps, including the notorious Hanoi Hilton,
a place of unimaginable horrors — torture, beatings, starvation and mind-numbing isolation. When Kerry branded
us "war criminals," he handed our captors all the justification they needed to carry out their threats to execute us.
Thanks to Kerry, Jane Fonda and their comrades in the anti-war movement, our captivity was prolonged by years. The communists
in Hanoi and Moscow couldn’t have had a better press agent to spread their anti-American propaganda.
To guarantee Stolen Honor would never be seen by anyone — not even theatre-goers — the
producer was slapped with a libel and defamation lawsuit.
That lawsuit was filed by a long-time anti-war disciple
of the Massachusetts Senator. He was one of Kerry's key war crimes "witnesses," one of several on whom Kerry claims
he based his Senate testimony.
The lawsuit put a unique spin on the definition of defamation, claiming that Stolen Honor had damaged
the public reputations of himself, Kerry and others by simply quoting their own words and criticisms of America during the
Vietnam war!
The POWs and the wives of POWs who participated in Stolen Honor refused to abandon the facts conveyed
in the film. For some of us, it was the first time since our release by the Communists in 1973 that we were able to have our
voices publicly heard, to tell our stories about the consequences of Kerry’s treachery. In 2005, we formed a nonprofit
organization, the Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF), to gather records, documents and other materials to form a fact-based,
educational repository for students and scholars of Vietnam history and to tell the true story of the American soldiers in
Vietnam. The VVLF’s mission is "to set the record straight, factually, about Vietnam and those who fought there."
For our efforts, we were promptly sued by two long-time anti-war Kerry followers and VVAW members. It was
clear that Kerry not only wanted to punish us for Stolen Honor; he intended to use surrogates to sue us into permanent
silence and financial ruin.
Forced to spend huge sums to defend ourselves from these frivolous lawsuits, we have filed a countersuit against
these Kerry surrogates and intend to reveal the truth about the lawsuits and their sponsors. We believe that we can prove
that the purpose of nearly two years of litigation was to protect John Kerry, to drain us financially and spiritually, and
to prevent us from setting the record straight.
At stake is ultimately nothing less than the integrity of the American military in Vietnam, the honor of the
men who served their country, the nobility of those who gave their lives, and the truth of America’s history in Vietnam.
Until or unless we do correct the existing record, the American military may never be free of the myths and smears of Vietnam,
its honor and integrity cleansed as it fights to defend freedom at home and around the world.
Our mission is hardly over. We hope you will join us in fighting this battle . . . for our soldiers, then
and now. For more information about
Vietnam, the foregoing litigation, or to make a donation, please access the VVLF website now — Go Here Now.
Col. George E. "Bud" Day Director and President, Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation
Col. George E. "Bud" Day, USAF (Ret.,) was a POW in North Vietnam for five years, seven months and 13 days.
He served in three wars (WWII, Korea, and Vietnam) and earned the Medal of Honor. He is the Air Force’s
most decorated living veteran. He is the Director and President of the Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation, Inc., an
organization created to better educate and inform the public about the Vietnam War, its events, its history, and the men and
women who sacrificed to serve their country. Please go here to read Col.
Day’s statement in its entirety. | | | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Please turn on your computer's speakers and press your "Refresh"
key to hear John Kerry admit to war crimes. If you would like to hear it again, please press your "Refresh" key.
HOLLYWOOD VIETNAM WAR NEWS:
Oliver Stone recruits Bruce Willis for My Lai massacre film
| WEBMASTER |

|
| WEBMASTER |
The Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation can be contacted by
emailing vets@vvlf.org or by mail at:
Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation
Philadelphia, PA 19195-1655
Absolutely True Story About Senator
John Kerry
Words of Captain Donald L.
Nelson, JAG corps USN ret: I was on active duty as a U.S. Navy JAG, when all of this was going on 25 to
30 years ago, and so was Mark F. Sullivan, who at all relevant times was the personal JAG to J. William Middendorf, then the
Secretary of the Navy.
We are trying to
break this absolutely true story nationwide, i.e., Fox News, C-Span, and hopefully the major networks. We are
positive that John Kerry was one of those dishonorably dismissed from the Navy for collaborating with the Viet Cong after
he was released from active duty, but still in the Navy and for a totally unauthorized trip to Paris. John Kerry later
got an "honorable" separation in 1978, some 12 years after joining the Navy, under President Carter's "Amnesty Program" for
draft dodgers, and other malcontents, who fled to Canada and Holland, among other places, to avoid military service
to our country.
This
is why John Kerry has refused, and continues to refuse, to release all of his Navy records: they reflect that he was Dishonorably
Dismissed from the United States Naval Service. If they do not (which they do) he would have released them to the public.
Again, he has not done so, because he well knows that the truth would kill his challenge to President Bush. If
you would like to talk with me, I may be reached at telephone number (925) 964-0943 in Danville, California, or at DLNelsonSF@msn.com . Contact information for CAPT Sullivan
is below.
Sincerely, DONALD
L. NELSON CAPT, JAGC, USNR (Ret.)
Mark F. Sullivan
Sullivan Taketa LLP 31351 Via Colinas, Suite 205 Westlake Village, CA 91362-4576 Tel. (818) 889-2299 mark.sullivan@calawcounsel.com
"How do you ask a man to be the last man to
die for a mistake?"
John Kerry
April 22, 1971
- At the time of his statements
before the United States Congress, television news reporters and cameras, and Vietnamese Communist Negotiators in Paris,
France, John Kerry was still in the United States Navy.
Learn the details at:
John Kerry destroyed the morale of many troops
in the field during the Vietnam War, and he is doing it again.
UNDER
THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 14.
(You
can post some comments at the site)
Please Pass The Word
About Our Petition. John Kerry is not going away on his own. He'll be in Congress condemning and belittling
our troops for years to come. Unless we do something about it...
WE ARE
IN THIS TOGETHER.
WHY DO
THESE TWO YOUNG MARINES LOOK DRUNK?
|
PLEASE PRESS
FOR A LARGER PICTURE COPY |
|
 Jack, 19 George, 18
|
|
|
Webmaster Jack Cunningham
(Sussex, NJ) and George Dros (Cooperstown, NY) are sitting at a table in a Duc Duc Refugee Village peasant hut, near the village's
market place. The two, young United States Marines are members of CAP Team 2-9-2. (CAP Teams were composed
of about 8 to 13 Americans, who lived and served 24/7 in Vietnamese peasant-farming villages. The Duc Duc
Refugee Village was composed of about 2,000 homes.)
In the above picture, Jack's and George's eyes were
shut, because of complete exhaustion. It was July 1970. At the time this picture was taken, the Americans in Duc
Duc were not sure whether the CAP Unit would be pulled out of the village or whether it would be wiped out. We were
experiencing heavy combat. Intelligence reports were coming in daily that the Communists wanted to punish the village
while the Americans were still there.
By wiping out
CAP 2-9-2, the terrorists hoped to leave an example to other CAP Villages. With alerts at the highest level, night ambush
responsibilities were 100% watch throughout the night. With two long patrols a day going outside the village, it didn't
leave much time for the eight or so Americans to sleep.
Around the day this
picture was taken, an intelligence report came in from the 1st Marine Division Headquarters in Da Nang that the high Communist
Command wanted to speed up President Nixon's troop pullout from Vietnam. They wanted to embarrass the Americans on a
wide-scale and influence the American People into pressuring a faster troop pullout. Their plan called for wiping out
the Fifth Marines at An Hoa. It was going to involve thousands of Communist Forces. The Village of Duc Duc was
on the large Marine Base's perimeter and was said to be the main route for the Communist attack. Our orders that night
in July 1970 was to set up in the most well protected position. Our Cap Unit was expected to try and hold off the Communist
drive off as long as possible. We were expected to serve as a warning or trip wire (Queens Gambit) for the Fifth Marines.
Months after Jack and George pulled out of the
village of Duc Duc, the Vietnamese communists punished the peasant village by burning it to the ground. Hundreds of
civilian men, women and children were killed, wounded and reported missing. Two thousands homes were reduced to ashes.
The blaze could be seen from twenty-five (25) miles away in Da Nang. It was the light of the blaze that guided United
States Marines helicopters to the scene.
| PRESS PICTURE FOR LARGER COPY |

|
|
Above is nineteen year old Jack Cunningham with one of the boys
from the Duc Duc Refugee Village.
Below is the full picture of the same scene.
| PRESS
PICTURE FOR LARGER COPY |

|
|
The boy with Jack is the Marine's village boy. These village boys would run errands, cook C-Rations,
clean up-after, massage tense muscles and serve as interpreters for the Marines. Usually, each Marine had their own
boy to help him around the village.
Many times, adult peasants of Duc Duc would supply these boys with intelligence information of planned
terrorist attacks on the village. Supplying these intelligence reports on terrorist movements and plans may have
been the reason why the Duc Duc Refugee Village was later burned to ashes.
A month after the above picture was taken, the boy lost both of his parents in a terrorist rocket attack
on their area of the Duc Duc Refugee Village. After his parents were killed, the boy moved to a relative's
home closer to the City of Da Nang; which in the long run saved his life the night of the Duc Duc Massacre.
...........
|
Former CAP Marine and
webmaster Jack Cunningham and his wife, Joan |
 |
|
|
|
 |